22/05: I say we send 'em the bill
Category: Canadian politics
Posted by: ajmilne
… y’know, the one for the unwanted pregnancies, abortion services rendered, STD treatments…
… not to mention additional costs to the larger system due to people who, under the stress of unwanted pregnancies, drop out of school or otherwise generally find their young lives under significantly greater pressure.
Yeah, James Moore, you shameless panderer. Let’s talk turkey: the truth is, you just wanted to toss a bone to your Brylcreem Brigade base, and who gives a rat’s ass whose lives it screws up, right?
And seriously, you and that small gaggle of the endlessly dazed who wrote in to protest the exhibit: how spectacularly stupid can you be? Let’s get this straight: do you really think a science museum exhibit is a bad way for your kids to learn about sex?
So what’s the plan, here? Tell ‘em that’s off limits and hope they get it from internet porn, mebbe?
‘Cos, news flash, dearies: that’s how it’s going to work. So I think, seriously, ‘mongst the folk who might be passing along a little info, the lot up at 1867 St. Laurent were probably one of your better options.
So, yeah, pal, you and the slope-foreheaded CFRA listeners who wrote in on a script to complain, winding up with the exhibit now being that much less accessible to those it was actually meant to reach: expect a bill.
It’s like you lot are always preaching, tho’ clearly without much understanding the same: actions have consequences.
… not to mention additional costs to the larger system due to people who, under the stress of unwanted pregnancies, drop out of school or otherwise generally find their young lives under significantly greater pressure.
Yeah, James Moore, you shameless panderer. Let’s talk turkey: the truth is, you just wanted to toss a bone to your Brylcreem Brigade base, and who gives a rat’s ass whose lives it screws up, right?
And seriously, you and that small gaggle of the endlessly dazed who wrote in to protest the exhibit: how spectacularly stupid can you be? Let’s get this straight: do you really think a science museum exhibit is a bad way for your kids to learn about sex?
So what’s the plan, here? Tell ‘em that’s off limits and hope they get it from internet porn, mebbe?
‘Cos, news flash, dearies: that’s how it’s going to work. So I think, seriously, ‘mongst the folk who might be passing along a little info, the lot up at 1867 St. Laurent were probably one of your better options.
So, yeah, pal, you and the slope-foreheaded CFRA listeners who wrote in on a script to complain, winding up with the exhibit now being that much less accessible to those it was actually meant to reach: expect a bill.
It’s like you lot are always preaching, tho’ clearly without much understanding the same: actions have consequences.
