02/02: No particular comment
Category: General science news
Posted by: ajmilne
…as this was due, I’ve already kinda commented on this, and everyone else is doing it anyway.
Still, it’s pretty huge. The Atlantic’s back of the envelope calculation on the actual count of planets in the habitable zone in a given volume of space is food for thought, especially.
(/… today’s possible solution to Haldane’s dilemma: they know there’s a habitable world here, and they more or less said: ‘So what? Those are like, everywhere. Call us when they come up with TV worth watching.’ But this, too, I’ve kinda already riffed on.)
Still, it’s pretty huge. The Atlantic’s back of the envelope calculation on the actual count of planets in the habitable zone in a given volume of space is food for thought, especially.
(/… today’s possible solution to Haldane’s dilemma: they know there’s a habitable world here, and they more or less said: ‘So what? Those are like, everywhere. Call us when they come up with TV worth watching.’ But this, too, I’ve kinda already riffed on.)


Scott Garten wrote:
But in the future, it will be necessary for humanity to spread to the stars. Question is,how do we get there. With no FTL drive on the drawing board, generational ships may be the answer. Do we send the tired, the poor, the huddled masses yearning to breathe free? Not likely, we send our best and brightest. By accelerating to near-light speed, the time the travelers will have spent on any voyage will be greatly shortened. What to use for reaction mass: interstellar gasses.
All this has been addressed in science fiction stories since the 1940s. The technology to do all this may well exist; the will to do it is in question.